Artificial intelligence has rapidly become the centerpiece of modern business strategy. From automating workflows to generating reports and creative content, companies across industries are investing heavily in AI tools to boost efficiency and innovation. Yet, despite the excitement and spending, the results have been far less impressive.
A new MIT Media Lab report reveals that 95% of organizations have seen no measurable return on their generative AI investments. While integration challenges and limited contextual understanding play a role, researchers suggest there’s another, subtler factor at work — something called “AI workslop.” This emerging concept describes polished but unproductive AI output that looks helpful yet ultimately wastes time, drains productivity, and undermines collaboration. And it may be costing enterprises millions without them realizing it.
Read More: Facebook’s New AI Feature Chooses Your Best Photos and Videos for You
The AI Hype vs. Reality Gap
Businesses across nearly every industry have been betting big on artificial intelligence in the workplace. From automating reports to generating marketing copy, the promise has been clear: greater efficiency, smarter insights, and higher productivity.
Yet, the reality hasn’t lived up to the hype. According to a new report from MIT Media Lab, a staggering 95% of organizations have seen no measurable return on their investments in generative AI tools.
Despite the massive spending and adoption rates, most enterprises aren’t experiencing the promised boost in productivity or innovation. Instead, many are struggling to integrate AI tools in ways that actually improve business outcomes.
Why AI Isn’t Delivering: The Adoption and ROI Gap
The MIT report identifies a few key reasons for this disconnect between enthusiasm and execution:
- Misaligned Workflows: AI doesn’t neatly slot into existing processes. Most workplace tools weren’t built with AI in mind, making integration clunky or inefficient.
- Limited Contextual Awareness: Even the most advanced generative models still struggle with industry-specific nuance, leading to generic or inaccurate outputs.
- Overreliance Without Strategy: Many organizations adopted AI tools reactively — chasing trends rather than building strategic frameworks for use.
But according to a separate study from BetterUp Labs, there’s another hidden culprit behind the lack of measurable ROI: something researchers call “AI workslop.”
What Is AI Workslop?
Writing in Harvard Business Review, the BetterUp Labs team defines workslop as:
“AI-generated content that looks polished but doesn’t actually move work forward.”
In simple terms, it’s the illusion of productivity. AI churns out an email, report, or presentation that seems finished — but actually requires more time and effort to fix than if an employee had done it manually.
Employees end up spending hours editing, rewriting, or clarifying AI’s “help.” The result? A slowdown in actual productivity masked by a flurry of AI-assisted activity.
The Hidden Cost of Workslop
The numbers paint a worrying picture. According to BetterUp Labs:
- Employees spend an average of 1 hour and 56 minutes per day dealing with workslop — reviewing, correcting, and cleaning up AI output.
- Roughly 40% of all AI-generated workplace content qualifies as workslop.
- In companies with 10,000+ employees, the lost productivity can cost up to $9 million annually.
The burden doesn’t stop with the original creator. Managers and coworkers are often pulled in to “fix” the content, creating a ripple effect across teams. Instead of streamlining collaboration, AI ends up multiplying redundant work.
When AI Becomes a Burden
Researchers link this phenomenon to cognitive offloading — our natural tendency to rely on external tools to reduce mental effort. Ideally, AI should handle low-level tasks so employees can focus on higher-value work.
But with workslop, the opposite happens. The “offloaded” work simply shifts to someone else. BetterUp found that:
- 40% of workslop cases are passed between peers.
- 16% come from managers delegating AI-generated content to their teams.
In other words, employees aren’t just dealing with bad AI output — they’re inheriting each other’s digital clutter. Over time, this erodes team morale and trust, especially when colleagues feel burdened by someone else’s “AI shortcuts.”
The Cultural Cost: Frustration and Friction
Beyond productivity loss, workslop has a serious cultural impact. BetterUp’s researchers found that employees exposed to frequent workslop reported feeling:
- Annoyed at the extra workload.
- Confused by unclear or incomplete information.
- Offended when AI-generated work was passed off as genuine effort.
This emotional fallout can weaken team cohesion, damage credibility, and fuel resentment — especially in organizations that prize efficiency and accountability.
Why Stopping AI Isn’t the Answer
Faced with disappointing results, some organizations may be tempted to scale back or abandon AI tools altogether. But according to BetterUp Labs, that’s not the right solution.
Instead of rejecting AI, companies should focus on governing how it’s used. The key lies in developing clear organizational guidelines that define:
- When AI should be used: For brainstorming, data analysis, or summarizing — not for critical decision-making or nuanced communication.
- When AI shouldn’t be used: In contexts where accuracy, tone, or originality are essential.
- How AI output should be reviewed: Establishing quality checks before anything AI-generated reaches clients or leadership.
These policies can transform AI from a novelty into a trusted tool that supports — rather than replaces — human work.
Shifting the Mindset: From Crutch to Collaborator
BetterUp Labs recommends reframing AI’s role within organizations. Instead of viewing it as a shortcut, companies should treat AI as a collaborator — a tool that enhances human effort, not substitutes for it.
That means encouraging employees to use AI to:
- Accelerate ideation, not automate thinking.
- Support productivity, not simulate it.
- Enhance clarity, not obscure it with synthetic polish.
This shift requires both training and culture change. Teams need to understand not just how to use AI tools, but when and why to use them effectively.
Building AI Literacy Across the Organization
To combat workslop and unlock real value from AI, enterprises must invest in AI literacy at every level. That includes:
- Education and Upskilling: Teaching employees how to prompt, evaluate, and refine AI output responsibly.
- Process Redesign: Integrating AI where it naturally fits — not forcing it into workflows that don’t benefit.
- Measurement and Feedback: Continuously tracking AI’s contribution to productivity, quality, and employee satisfaction.
As AI technology evolves, so must the systems and mindsets that govern it. Organizations that master this balance will gain a competitive edge — not just in efficiency, but in innovation and trust.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is AI workslop?
AI workslop refers to AI-generated content that looks polished or complete but doesn’t actually move work forward. It often requires employees to spend extra time editing, correcting, or clarifying what the AI produced — reducing, rather than improving, productivity.
Why is AI workslop a problem for businesses?
Workslop creates the illusion of productivity while increasing hidden workloads. Employees spend valuable hours fixing low-quality AI output, and the ripple effect can cost large enterprises millions in lost productivity and team efficiency.
How common is workslop in the workplace?
According to research by BetterUp Labs, around 40% of all AI-generated content in workplaces qualifies as workslop. Employees reportedly spend nearly two hours per day dealing with it.
Can companies eliminate AI workslop completely?
Not entirely — but they can reduce it significantly. The key is setting clear guidelines for when and how to use AI, ensuring quality control, and training employees to recognize when AI adds value versus when it introduces inefficiency.
What’s the best way for organizations to manage AI use effectively?
Businesses should develop AI governance policies that outline acceptable uses, review processes, and ethical considerations. Equally important is building AI literacy across teams — teaching employees to treat AI as a collaborator, not a crutch.
How much does AI workslop cost enterprises?
For companies with more than 10,000 employees, BetterUp Labs estimates that workslop-related inefficiencies can cost up to $9 million annually, not including the cultural and morale impacts caused by frustration and confusion.
Should businesses stop using AI tools altogether?
No. The goal isn’t to abandon AI but to use it strategically. Organizations should identify tasks where AI truly enhances value — such as brainstorming, data analysis, or drafting summaries — and avoid applying it to tasks requiring deep expertise, empathy, or creative nuance.
Conclusion
The promise of AI in the enterprise was never just about speed or cost savings — it was about enabling smarter, more meaningful work. But without thoughtful implementation, AI becomes another layer of noise and inefficiency. Workslop is a symptom of that imbalance — a warning sign that technology is outpacing our ability to use it wisely.
